🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Conflict Regarding System & Ideology

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin him for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.